Seeing as how the development/maintenance, much of the basic functionality, the target goal, and the supported platforms are _not_ the same, the question isn't particularly relevant. At least not at this point in time.
~ Nathan On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:17 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]>wrote: > Probably the main question is if there is any difference in the > development/maintenance process of the wrapper? If both projects do the > same, why not to join efforts instead of reinventing the wheel? It is > always possible to strip unneeded API from the result. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pyglet-users/-/swenBeHbkLgJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
