Initially I didn't use Cython for the buffer generation. But the amount of modules you could wrap was quite small before you had drop out. Cython just increased that number and allowed more things to be done in the same time delta.
Actually the very first cut was generators that yielded sample values. But the call overhead was just so great there was no way you could generate 44100 meaningful values in a second. Crispin On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:47 AM, makemachine <[email protected]> wrote: > This looks like an interesting start. Was your choice to use Cython because > of some test that showed you needed the optimization or is there some other > reason? I'll take a closer look at this over the course of the couple of > days and see where I can take it. > Thanks, > ~J > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pyglet-users/-/OldRC8WaL0gJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
