I think the most useful would be to have at least one system to order the reports. Although not able to interpret the output of the reports, the system can at least classify and determine which platform / OS / GDM / python versions were tested.
With respect to the TODO list for the next release, may you can add the fixfor the issue 394. (I am posting this because the google issue system says that the responses to the issue are reported, but to whom? the owner? can add another person as CC copy? Mmm, too many questions) El jueves, 21 de junio de 2012 21:58:02 UTC-3, Richard Jones escribió: > > On 22 June 2012 10:32, Winston Wolff wrote: > > I'm going to spend another day tomorrow working on the release. My to do > list is: > > > > - apply Txema's work on documentation > > - apply patch in issue 580 from M Paola for DDS_RGBA_DXT1_LOAD test > failures > > - go through issues to see if there are other patches that look useful > and safe (I don't want to add too much which might delay this release) > > - try to fix other test failures > > Awesome, thanks! I'm sorry I've been so quiet this week. I think after > applying the few fixes that've come up during testing we should push > out the release, with the intention of releasing the alpha "early" and > releasing fixes often. > > > > - improve output format of test runner so we can get better data on how > Pyglet is working. > > Just some thoughts on this. Pie in the sky stuff. It would be useful > if this could include some thinking about what to do with test > reports. Having people email the mailing list - or even creating > individual issue tracker items - mostly generates noise. If the test > run output could be generated in a structured manner we could feed it > into a collation system (which wouldn't take a significant effort to > develop.) The run output would need to include the OpenGL info dump, > repository version and testing log. The testing log would ideally be > able to be captured over multiple partial runs to allow for complete > system failures in individual tests. > > I'd be happy to install a web service to collate the above information > if someone were to write it. Doesn't have to be fancy. If no-one steps > up I'll try to write something myself. If we do get something done > it'd be good to have from the earliest alpha releases. > > > Richard > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pyglet-users/-/rKrLhj9e2dAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
