On 18 July 2013 06:19, "Juan J. Martínez" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/07/13 00:35, Richard Jones wrote: >> [...] >> As I said privately, there's no formalised processes with this >> project, mostly because there's no project lead. >> > > OK, after a quick run through the tickets and the repository: > > - Most tickets refer to pyglet 1.1.x > - There are very old tickets > - Several tickets have patches (gold!) > > There are 22 listed committers and, although the pace has been slow > after the release of 1.2 alpha1 (1.2 from now on), the project didn't > stop until early this year. That's good! > > I know how difficult is getting things going, so here follows my proposal: > > It doesn't look like 1.1.x is being maintained, so suggest we keep 1.1.4 > as stable but work towards releasing 1.2 alpha2 before checking the > roadmap and start striking things out for an eventual 1.2 beta1. > > To do this, I would go trough the bug list and... > > - Ask bug reporters to confirm bugs with 1.2 alpha1 (it is going to be > very painful with very old tickets, so some tickets will be closed as > "deprecated"). > - Fix bugs in 1.2 (default branch). > - When we get to a dead end with the bug list, release 1.2 alpha2. > - Make 1.2 easier to install (put docs online too) and encourage users > to try it (for me has been quite stable and joystick support is a big > selling point!).
I think that's a good plan! Richard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
