Would it be better? What would have to change? (I don't know six yet...) As far as my 30 seconds sniff on the manual page goes, it would/might impact the performance negatively... Rob <[email protected]> schrieb am Thu Feb 05 2015 at 10:09:07:
> Hi, > > Currently we natively support Py2 and support Py3 through 2to3. Fixing > issues in Py3 is quite a hassle like this, but we also do not want to lose > Py2 support yet. How would you feel about using a library like six to > create a codebase that supports both Py2 and Py3 without 2to3? > > Rob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
