I also agree - I think it's best to move forward, and give warning that things might break, than be held back because of scenarios that are really the minority of use cases.
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:30:10 AM UTC-4, swiftcoder wrote: > > I would tend to agree. Though if we known of projects that will be > affected (i.e. something like Cocos), then reaching out proactively would > be a nice thing to do -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
