On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, C. Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:28:40AM -0700, Rob Kirkpatrick wrote: > -> I read a bit about licenses but never understood the long-term pros and > cons > -> of each of the open source ones. Does GPL qualify as a default if you > don't > -> have a compelling reason to use another? There has been a bit of > chatter on > -> the testing in python mailing list about the Pylint guys changing their > -> license to let others use their code, so I guess some of this is not > fixed > -> in stone... > > Jenny, you'll retain copyright, so at least under American law you can > change the license whenever you want. I would suggest BSD, which is > really non-restrictive; I believe Chris is planning to change pygr over > to BSD as well. Either is fine by me. Hey Titus, Thank you for your suggestion! I will go with BSD. Since Chris is going to change pygr over to BSD, it will be consistent with pygr's license as well. Cheers, --jenny > > -- > C. Titus Brown, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
