On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:59 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Have you considered Cython?
yes, we discussed this in the Pygr discussion group a while back, but Titus wasn't very keen, at least not any time soon. Titus, am I summarizing this right? > > > On Jan 26, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Christopher Lee wrote: > >> >> Marek, I suggest that you summarize Pygr's exact Pyrex version >> dependencies, since they seem to be multiplying... For example, I >> remember a couple of different Pyrex bugs that make the Pyrex version >> crucial. I think they're both in the issue tracker. Getting rid of >> "prefixed module filenames" would add a third dependency (since >> Istvan >> says this was only added in 0.9.8). I suggest you add your summary >> to >> the tracker as a new 0.8 issue "What pyrex version should pygr >> require?", and then the developer group can discuss and decide this >> issue. Finally, we'll also add this dependency information to both >> the documentation and setup.py pyrex version check. >> >> -- Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
