On May 5, 2009, at 6:42 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> > This is, I think, why Marek and I keep on suggesting alternatives like > 'continue using git.or.cz for the master' or 'use a new pygr > account' or > 'name it pygr-master'. It's a clean and fairly obvious way of > specifying which repo is the master. Can I suggest that we reserve the term "master" for the branch called "master"? When referring to an entire repository, let's use another term like the "official" Pygr repository. (if someone has a better suggestion, please tell us!) Thus: "official repository" vs. "master branch". Let's not confuse these by using "master" interchangeably for both repositories and branches -- "master" has a very specific meaning in git parlance. -- Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to pygr-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pygr-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
