On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:09:58PM -0700, Paul Rigor (gmail) wrote: -> One would be a better solution is extend SQLTable to be compatible with -> GFF3(or 2 or 1) schema.
What do you mean -- provide a generic loading function for GFF_X schema into a SQLTable-wrapped SQL database? Or do you mean to provide a SQLTable-like wrapper that uses the GFF file as the database? The former seems like a good idea, the latter seems less than scalable ;) -> In our group, we're using UCSC's Genome Browser (BED/BEDgraph) and -> GBrowse-based browsers for viewing genomic features. We basically have two -> sets of databases which are SQLTable-compatible for pygr and another -> GFF3-compatible for GBrowse use. Have I mentioned pygr-draw to you yet? I am slowly working on replacing GMOD's functionality with a pygr/Python solution and I would welcome comments and input. It's not really ready for use by others yet; I'm growing it slowly to meet my own needs. It's all up on github.com/ctb/. cheers, --titus -- C. Titus Brown, [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
