On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:53:07 +0200 Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The _pg library has been pretty stable for many years now. There will be > a few additions and improvements, but the basic functionality and > methods will probably not be rewritten or renamed in the near future. > But D'Arcy should comment on that, too.
It should remain stable but it is not guaranteed. > My recommendation is that you write your own Python API module according > to your needs based on top of _pg. You can take pg or pgdb as a starting > point. If there will be major changes in _pg, then you only have to > adapt your API module, not your whole application. That would be my reccommendation as well. You can also consider submitting changes to the existing pg module (pgdb if it fits in DB-API) if suitable. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[email protected]> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. _______________________________________________ PyGreSQL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.vex.net/mailman/listinfo/pygresql
