On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:35:30 +0100 Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > That's true, Postgres arrays have never been supported by Pygres, > probably because they were pretty restricted anyway so hardly anybody > was using them (maybe they have become more useful in newer Postgres > versions, though).
I used arrays way back when I first started using Postgres but gave them up pretty quick. I found that whenever I used an array, a small table was a lot simpler and more flexible. > However, motivation to work on Pygres dwindled strongly after psycopg2 > changed its license and has become so much better, so there seems to be > no real need for Pygres any more these days. E.g. I think psycopg2 > already supports arrays. > > But resuming Pygres development is still on my todolist, it would be a > shame to let Pygres die. Don't know what others think (D'Arcy?). Agreed. I have been a bit busy lately but there are two items at the top of my personal list; Support Python 3 and make the classic interface pur Python so that it can work with any other interface such as psycopg2 and even non PostgreSQL DB-API modules. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain PyGreSQL Development Group http://www.PyGreSQL.org _______________________________________________ PyGreSQL mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.vex.net/mailman/listinfo/pygresql
