I wasn't talking about configuring widgets like that. I was talking about
making it so that the following code would work:
def handler(wid):
print wid.attribute
wid.attribute = "Hello World"
wid.connect("some-signal", wid)
wid.emit("some-signal")
The setting of properties is still available using label['label'] =
"Hello" type code. I will probably not put in support forsetting all
properties from the constructor because that would be deviating from GTK+
a bit much (the closer pygtk is to gtk, the less I have to document :)
James Henstridge.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Richard Fish wrote:
> James Henstridge wrote:
> >
> > Yep ... that is exactly what I am talking about. I wish I had thought of
> > this solution earlier :) I will probably implement it by storing a
>
> Cool!
>
> I guess I'll bring up one more convention that would be nice to support:
>
> l=GtkLabel(label="Hello",alignment=(0,0))
> f=GtkFrame(label="Test Frame",alignment=(0,0),shadow=SHADOW_IN)
>
> I've missed the ability to create widgets like this since I gave up on
> Tk. Right now, I use my own wrapper classes to handle this. But since
> you are going to be adding support for configuring widgets via the
> __setattr__ method, it seems the next logical step is to allow keyword
> arguments to an __init__ method to be filtered through __setattr__.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Richard Fish Enhanced Software Technologies, Inc.
> Software Developer 4014 E Broadway Rd Suite 405
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phoenix, AZ 85040
> (602) 470-1115 http://www.estinc.com
> To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
