This message bounced because the subscriber address was not in the list.
As for the question, I have fallen a bit behind with updating pyglade.
Maybe it would be useful to switch over to a set of bindings for libglade,
which would give similar power, and may be a bit faster. What do other
people think?
James.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:29:54 +0800 (WST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [James Macnicol
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 13 10:29:52 1999
Received: from evans.ee.adfa.edu.au (evans.ee.adfa.edu.au [131.236.30.24])
by quoll.daa.com.au (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA07178
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:29:51 +0800 (WST)
Received: (from jamesm@localhost)
by evans.ee.adfa.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA16693
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:19:14 +1000 (EST)
From: James Macnicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pyglade
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 99 12:19:14 EST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL17]
What's the status of the pyglade code? Is it being hacked on at
the moment, or should I be volunteering my services? ;-) Seems like there
are *lots* of gaps in it.
--
James Macnicol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
