Well, the pygtk/gnome-python bindings are not completely hand crafted.
The low level wrappers are auto generated. In the next version almost all
of pygtk will be autogenerated, so I don't think the fact that it is
autogenerated is a big deal.
I use my own code generators as none of the general ones do what I wanted
(generate object oriented wrappers using ExtensionClass for a C library).
I guess the Qt guys came to the same conclusion, as they have there own
code generator as well. I haven't looked at the kde python bindings, so
can't comment on the quality of the bindings, or if I think their method
of wrapping is a good one (the current way pygtk and gnome-python is done
has its problems, which is why I am redoing parts of it).
James.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Michael Lauer wrote:
> Howdy, don't want to start a flamewar (so
> please don't comment on Qt/KDE itself), but
> is someone amongst our little community who
> has experience with the Python bindings to
> Qt/KDE ? It seems to me that they're partly
> automatically generated by some tool named
> SIP (lightweight SWIG-alike). How do these
> bindings compare to the "handcrafted" PyGTK
> /PyGnome ones ?
>
> I'm currently evaluating both bindings
> for using on my forthcoming project, a
> decent Python RAD Environment.
>
> Any comments ?
>
> Have a nice day!
>
> --
> Regards & Gruesse from Mickey @ http://www.Vanille.de
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> How could anyone know me - when I don't even know myself ?
> To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
