On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 06:39:32PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Under Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress
> this letter cannot be considered "spam" as long as we include:
> 1) contact information (see above); and,
> 2) the way to be removed from future mailings (see below).
>
> To be removed from this list, please mail to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'remove' in
> subject line and you will be removed from our list.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
In case anyone is interested, "s.1618 Title III" also says the contact
information must appear at the beginning of the message.
A technicality, yes.
But more importantly, this was only passed by the Senate; I believe
the House's corresponding bill ( HR 3888 ) explicitly refrained from
making any distinction. No law was ever passed.
So legally, it's still spam.
I would e-mail earthlink.net, but I don't know the procedure for mailing
lists; can list recipients respond, or is it up to the list maintainer to complain?
--
Clint Hepner Dept. of Computer Science
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dartmouth College
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
