On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Evan Martin wrote: > > On 2001.01.09 12:59:37 -0800 George Young wrote: > > I do hope to find a solution that does not require such extra widgets, > > (even though I know boxes are light-weight). > > My application tends to stretch the limits of X performance -- if some > > accursed user > > decides to open up all ~800 steps, each with one of these togglebuttons, > > this solution > > adds yet another 800 boxes to the mess... Maybe I should try growing > > potatoes instead. > ^ intentional? :) Of course it was intentional. It is the correct spelling. See http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=potatoes > > Generally, if that becomes an issue, it'd be better to redesign your UI. > > _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
