On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> Matt> This raises a question - do we want to do gtk_widget_set_name by
> Matt> default on extended classes?
>
> I don't think that's necessary, since its available to the application
> programmer. Besides, that names a widget instance, not a widget class,
> right?
Yes, but we set names to the class names by default for instances that
don't do set_name. Matt, I'm not so sure; what would happen if we
_didn't_?
Take care,
--
Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil.
http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 272 3330 | NMFL
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
