yeah, that makes sense in the context. plus it gives users a little more information.
On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 13:34, Christian Reis wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 01:26:41PM -0400, Shandy Brown wrote: > > I know it's kind of AOLish, but I think "click here" would fit more > > naturally into some of the contexts than "link". > > "click here" doesn't take into account people using text or > text-to-voice browsers, so it's bad accessibility. I'm trying out > [www.hostname.where.link.is] - check it out and see if you like it. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. > http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
