Did anybody come up with anything better than this?

In the callback which was used in input_add:

    old = gtk.events_pending
    def duh(*args):
      return 0
    gtk.events_pending = duh
    self.do_real_work_with_data_read_from_file(data_read_from_file)
    gtk.events_pending = old

for this problem?

The reason this appears necessary is explained below.
*Somebody* has a better solution, I'm sure of it!

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jon Nelson wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jon Nelson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Christian Reis wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:56:04AM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote:
> > > > To make progress bars work, I use the following code:
> > > >
> > > >       while gtk.events_pending():
> > > >         gtk.mainiteration(0)
> > > >
> > > > And here is where I get into trouble.
> > > >
> > > > Assume the FIFO is still readable (perhaps I haven't read all of the
> > > > data, or perhaps new data has arrived).
> > > >
> > > > It appears that gtk.mainiteration will call read_from_fifo *again*,
> > > > which calls handle_fifo, which may result in calling mainiteration,
> > > > which may result in read_from_fifo being called, which ....
> > >
> > > Why not just use a global variable to lock this? Something like
> > >
> > >     self.block_read = 1
> > >
> > > and then set this just before your mainiteration loop. Then check for it
> > > inside read_from_fifo and only perform the actual read if you aren't
> > > blocked.
> >
> > I tried that very approach, and it didn't work for me.  I didn't spend a
> > great deal of time trying to figure out why. I'll look into it.
>
> Tried it.  Doesn't work. Here's why.
>
> Assume code similar to this:
>
>   def read_from_fifo(self, file, condition):
>     self.log("in read_from_fifo - %s" % (str((file,condition))))
>     if self.block_read:
>       return file
>     ...
>     self.io_queue.put( (verb, args) )
>     self.block_read = 1
>     self.handle_fifo_here()
>     self.block_read = 0
>     return file
>
>
> Every time mainiteration gets called, it appears that read_from_fifo
> gets called again.  It does nothing, and returns file (success).
> It simply keeps getting called over and over and over again.  Why?
> I tossed a simple print statement inside the while gtk.events_pending()
> loop, and yep.  They are forever pending.
>
> I'll try another approach:  the above combined with returning none, to
> disable the reading from the fifo, and then re-enable the I/O monitoring
> after enabling the block:
>
>   def read_from_fifo(self, file, condition):
>     self.log("in read_from_fifo - %s" % (str((file,condition))))
>     if self.block_read:
>       return gtk.FALSE # disables the I/O monitoring
>     ...
>     self.io_queue.put( (verb, args) )
>     self.block_read = 1
>     self.handle_fifo_here()
>     self.block_read = 0
>     self.enable_fifo_read() # <- or whatever it will be called.
>     return file
>
> ==== Experiment =====
>
> Nope.  That doesn't work either.  While there are no longer events
> pending, the process still hangs.  An strace shows that it appears to be
> locked:
>
> gettimeofday({1046702234, 903693}, NULL) = 0
> rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
> rt_sigsuspend([]
>
> ...
>
>
> Still, I'm open to ideas!

--
"Never try to write to ROM - it wastes your time and annoys the ROM."

Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C and Python Code Gardener
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/

Reply via email to