On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 12:39, Christian Reis wrote: > (I wonder how many spam filters will flag this subject line) > > So I've done a little profiling and run-down of how gtk.py is being > called, and I've managed to shave a second off startup time of a couple > of our applications using some simple changes to GtkObject. I'm > sending out the change for review and likely checkin (it seems like a > free lunch, no applications I have are broken). > > Can anybody still using 0.6.x give it a spin? I don't think the > semantics have changed at all, but maybe you use some evil __eq__ hack > that I'm unaware of. Comments are appreciated.
It didn't break my apps but I can't do any reasonable tests today as I'm running over an ssh pipe and am sure that is my limiting factor. > > Take care, > -- > Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. > http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ -- Steve McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Racemi, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
