> > I find the fact that we would need to > > break apart > > packages a bit annoying (and potentially a burden for releases and > > etc). > > That would seem to be a problem. It is a fairly arbitrary > imposition, so an unnecessary use (waste) of time in the longer term.
I've explained the reasons at length. But to summarise: We don't put unstable stuff in the GNOME Platform so we won't put unstable stuff in the GNOME Platform Bindings. And we won't put stuff in the GNOME Platform Bindings if it isn't a binding for the GNOME Platform. > My main disappointment in the "proposal" at the moment is > that whilst it should still be in proposal status it is being > pitched like a done deal. I have given everybody time to respond, and received the explicit blessing of the GNOME Board and release team, but we can't wait forever. The schedule must start and releases must be made. I have given pygtk extra time by creating a December 22nd deadline for tarball submissions. Murray Cumming www.murrayc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
