On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Jan Weil wrote: > * Ruby is more consequent in that _everything_ is an object.
This is personal taste, but with new-style Python classes in 2.2? forward it is less of an issue. > To sum it up: The main difference is that the Ruby bindings are not > automatically generated. IMO this leads to bindings which better suit a > certain language. And yes, GObject properties as attributes are part of > this. Consequently, I consider pyGTK partially not pythonesque enough. Hmmm, it almost sounds like what you want is a pyGtkMM binding set. Gtkmm does a good job of encapsulating Gtk stuff inside objects. I wonder if Gtkmm + Python + BoostPython would work for you. -a _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
