Christian, > > > I understand that the PyGTK list is also the place where the PyORBit > > > folks live. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I need some help: > > > > I also think so. > > It should be, but in practice the only person that has done work on > PyORBit is James Henstridge, and he's been very busy (and therefore > rarely on) the past months. Given that nobody's stepped up to pick up > patches (I know of at least one outstanding patch in Bugzilla that would > appreciate review and testing) I'd say right now it's "waiting for a > maintainer".
I expected this to be the case. Thanks for the input. > > > 3.) Is there anyone who would recommend another ORB (Other than ORBit2 > > > and PyORBit) implementation to use with python in this scenario? > > > > PyORBit has a incompatiblity problem with no ORBit2 servers [1][2]. I > > don't use other python ORBs. Sorry. > > You could try Duncan Grisby's omniORBpy, which has always been a very > mature and featureful library. I will definitively think about using omniORBpy (Since I've used the C++ bindings of omniORB before and had no problems with it). Again, thanks for the input. Regards, Andre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
