Sorry, I don't understand this discussion. Sure, dropline was "PyGtk Easy for Win32". But the installer is ceased. This means not more as "The Easy is put off PyGtk/32". All goes fine with PyGtk/32 if one will install all the stuff mentioned on the gimp/32 site. What we need is "Who will give us back the Easy?". For myself, I installed most of the time the gimp-gtk installer, as I use gimp/32 concurrent with PyGtk/32. The dllpath-stuff could be solved easily at installation time. The location for gtk2.x is well known. If it could be found there, okay add a registry key for this on HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\Python.exe Keyname: "Path" => Value: "<path>/<to>/<libs>". No more is needed to get this available for PyGtk/32. (Or I don't understand why this will run on my windows-box. ;-) Second: M$ put his installer utility (WiX http://www.sf.net/projects/wix/) under a open source license. So, if there are no license issues for all depending libraries (source code required?), could someone made a pygtk-2.x.msi binary package OR should we wait until the gimp guy's will have an installer? Both decisions have it's charme. So we should vote for a) "I want gtk-2.x with libxml2 and libglade and no gimp" -> own PyGtk/32 installer OR b) "I need only gtk-2.x and want use gimp" -> Gimp/32 installer. There are more combinations available, but not in the scope for the next decision.
--maik./ mit freundlichem Gru� / with best regards Maik Hertha -------------------------------------------- hartmann+hertha it design [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hartmann-hertha.de -------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
