On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:09:22AM -0500, Doug Quale wrote: > Christian Robottom Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:56:22AM -0500, Doug Quale wrote: > > > Like Sridhar I also find it inconvenient to have to specify signal > > > names in the glade file and then match them up in my code. I think > > > it's much easier to forget about setting the signals in the glade file > > > and simply connect them based on method names. > > > > And to be honest, I'd appreciate it if Gazpacho could offer a way to > > avoid even displaying this tab. It might be nice to have a "signal list" > > button to display signals associated with a widget, but maybe that's > > better dealt with via online docs. > > The signal list in gazpacho is very cool because it's nice to be able > to see all the appropriate signals in one place. The docs are good, > but it's inconvenient to have to check the entire class hierarchy.
Yeah, definitely true. That's one thing GTK+ docs could deal with in a nicer way -- showing inherited characteristics. I know epydoc does this automatically and it's just so useful. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
