On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > One thing that might prove the point and allow a split to actually happen, > is people volunteering to maintain the individual packages. It's pretty > scary to volunteer to help to maintain all of gnome-python, but it's not > so scary to maintain just the gnome-vfs or gconf bindings, for instance.
I guess we're just lacking some guts among the community members, then <wink>. Seriously, the way it's turned out is that a small group of special people are willing to maintain a small number of packages -- they aren't *that* big, and finding a number of people each with knowledge and committed to a certain package appears to be harder than motivating two or three experts to go on doing the good work they have been. I still think that given our social situation pygtk, gnome-python and pygtk-extras makes the most sense. I'm still interested in hearing otherwise, of course. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
