Sex, 2004-11-05 �s 08:22 -0700, Robert Uhl escreveu: > "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Yes. I am a bad gnome-python maintainer and forgot to migrate some > > gnome-python classes to the new property-based constructors, which allow > > transparent __init__ parent chaining. gnome.Canvas is still using old > > constructor system, therefore you must replace this: > > gnome.canvas.Canvas.__init__(self, aa=aa) > > with this: > > self.__gobject_init__(aa=aa) > > (or something like that) > > Ah, I see. Is the old method forward-compatible (i.e., when the bug > is fixed, will the old method still work?)?
Yes. __gobject_init__ may eventually become deprecated in pygtk 2.6, not will be kept for compatibility. We are forbidden to break API. And to answer kiko's earlier question: no, neither bug report nor cvs commit to fix this yet :-P > > BTW, any plans to auto-generate documentation for gnome-python as for > PyGTK? > > Thanks for all the good work. Gnome-python and PyGTK are a dream come > true. It's amazing how quickly my app is coming together. > -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The universe is always one step beyond logic.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
