On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:49 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> Also keep in mind that, despite popular belief, h2def is just a helper
> tool to avoid generating the defs entirely by hand. The defs need some
> manual tuning after the initial generation, so don't expect to re-run
> h2def later and replace the original defs. Basically, h2def != codegen.
indeed. Plus the fact that h2def is pretty sensitive as other bindings
are using it too (they're editing the def file after that, but still).
> > >
> > > h2defs expects the header to be somewhat similar to the gnome de facto
> > > standard headers. the script isn't really perfect, but there are so many
> > > possibilities that one has to put some restrictions.
> > I'm wrapping libnautilus-burn. At a first glance the headers seemed
> > quite standard.
>
> Hm.. this almost sounds like a good candidate for gnome-python-
> extras... >;-)
Sorry, I'm missing that binding interest. Could someone explain it ?
--
"Complexity has nothing to do with intelligence.
Simplicity does."
(Larry Bossidy, CEO, Allied Signal)
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
