On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Deliverable Mail wrote: > about it? Googling shows some postings claiming pygtk's coverage of > GTK was less than gtkperl's, and python's was also slower to start and > run. Is it still the case?
I'd be hard-pressed to answer that purely factually, but I at least imagine our coverage is as good as, if not better, to gtk-perl's. Our documentation is probably better, thanks in a large degree to John Finlay. Python's startup time has improved with more recent versions, additionally. What year were said postings from? Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
