On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:51:54PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:24:53PM -0300, Eric Jardim wrote: > > Hi, > > > > - What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the gtk.UIManager? > > - Does anybode here know the amount (not precisely) of people using PyGTK > > (or even GTK) with an action-oriented approach (with or without the UIMan)? > > - If an IDE, like glade or gazpacho, was capable of easily desing the > > actions/actiongroups and integrate them to the proxy widgets, would it > > still > > be necessary to use the UIManager? Or it is just useful to > > "hand-programming"? > > - How about this action merging. Can somewome highlight some useful example. > > > > Please, consider my questions as a kind of survey. I will much appreciate > > your opinions and experiences. > > > I've just started the process of converting from glade to uimanager because I > needed to have a good way to do action/ui merging. Depending on the type of > data I'm working with, I want to make available different functions from a > menu. Converting this to a uimanager means I can supply a ui description > and actiongroup with my modular functions in order to add to the menus.
Are you aware that Gazpacho has support for UIManager? Before recoding your application, check out that possibility. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
