Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote:
2005/12/3, Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Patches are accepted!
enclosed , if you prefer bugzilla let me know.
Patch applied!. Thanks Gian Mario.
From now on I'd like to have static copies of the existing articles in
the CVS, to avoid situations like that we have with the great tigrux
tutorial and applications. It has the drawback of not getting automatic
updates when the articles are changed, but they won't get lost as easily
as now. Of course, this could be done for "finished" articles, and not
for other docs that are much of a work in progress. What do you think
about it?. Do you think it's better keeping links and avoid local copies
as we do now?.
(And patches are also welcome to convert the existing articles living
outside www.pygtk.org to internal pages :))
--
Pachi
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [email protected]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
