On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 22:56 +0100, Thomas Dybdahl Ahle wrote: > Do you know about: > http://www.pardon-sleeuwaegen.be/antoon/python/page0.html > I like very much, that it takes up all the ways you can do threading in > pygtk, so you can compare them.
Yeah but I dont particuarly like the *_enter() *_leave() approach. Just preference I guess John > > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:01 +1300, John Stowers wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 22:44 -0200, Matías Alejandro Torres wrote: > > > John Stowers escribió: > > > > That page does not describe the approach that I use - the emission of > > > > signals on an idle handler. You can check that our here > > > > > > > > http://www.johnstowers.co.nz/blog/index.php/2007/03/12/threading-and-pygtk/ > > > > I have updated my pygtk threaded demo [0] to include progress reporting > > and non-blocking cancellation. Check out the linked blog post [2] for a > > good base upon which to build your own threaded pygtk apps. > > > > John > > > > [0] http://www.johnstowers.co.nz/files/FooThread.py > > [1] As much as is possible within the limitations of pythons > > non-cancellable threads > > [2] > > http://www.johnstowers.co.nz/blog/index.php/2007/03/12/threading-and-pygtk/ > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > Couldn't access the sample code! See if you can fix that. I'll take a > > > look at it later. It seems a good aproach. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Matias > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pygtk mailing list [email protected] > > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk > > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
