Johan Dahlin wrote: > Hi John, > >> I was just wondering what the plan for GIO/GVFS is. Will it live in >> pygtk, pygobject, pygnomevfs or somewhere else? > > The obvious place for GIO bindings is in pygobject. It could also be made > external, but it would depend on pygobject. > >> Is there currently work underway, or anything I can do to help? > > Nobody are working on bindings for GIO, at least not publicly. > GVFS is just additional modules without extra API as far as I know, so > there would be no need for specific bindings, the GIO ones would be enough.
Is this still the current state of affairs? The reason I'm asking is that I've just realised I should have used Gnome-VFS for a project, it really would have made the tool a lot more useful. Seeing that Gnome 2.22 is out and that it deprecates Gnome-VFS in favour of GIO/GVFS makes me hesitant to use Gnome-VFS at this time. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus．therning＠gmail．com http://therning.org/magnus What if I don't want to obey the laws? Do they throw me in jail with the other bad monads? -- Daveman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
