I haven't had much time to work on PyInstaller but I was reading the old emails and found this one that I never answer...
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 10:42 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > OK, but: do we still need Make.py if we go distutils? Probably not, but the port is not finished so we are stuck with it until the port. > Can they be used to > compile standard executables, or they just compile extensions (thus .so)? > Also I should note that distutils work with Python 1.5.2 but they weren't part > of the standard library back then. Maybe we should import them like we did for > Optik. Opinions? I think this might be an option and do some notes about it on the README.txt and the in the rest of the documentation.. What are we doing with the pyinstaler_1.x branch? Should the changes to Make.py be imported there? These changes basically add/fix x86_64 support but it start using distutils so we have the problem with the Python 1.5.2. -W _______________________________________________ PyInstaller mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.hpcf.upr.edu/mailman/listinfo/pyinstaller
