Am 11.12.2011 13:16, schrieb Martin Zibricky:
Here is my proposal for feature planning:
Plan looks good to me. Maybe only python 3k could be done earlier (in
2.1 ?)
Just because IMHO it's worth a larger step instead of +0.1 :-)
I assume it will become more time-consuming to implement py3k support. I
would prefer to release 2.0 early, because of all the changes we already
implemented are worth the release. When waiting for py3k support, this
will delay 2.0 release.
--
Schönen Gruß - Regards
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ.), CISSP, CSSLP
Goebel Consult
Spezialist für IT-Sicherheit in komplexen Umgebungen
http://www.goebel-consult.de
Monatliche Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/
Goebel Consult ist Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PyInstaller" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
