Am 31.08.2012 10:31, schrieb Martin Zibricky: > - Personally, I would rather spend more time on Python 3 than on > ensuring python 2.3 compatibility.
> On the other hand, is there any good reason and men power to still > maintain compatibility with Python 2.3? I totaly agree with Martin here. If somebody is starting a new project, he should not be using Python 2.3, since it is outdated and unmaintained. OTOH if somebody has an application still using Python 2.3 and is bundeling it with PyInstaller, we can simply say with the PyInstaller version he is using. [I personally would kick out any vendor who would try selling me code based on long-time unmaintained software. No matter if Python, Perl, Java.] If we spend our limited time in maintaining outdated versions, this hinders going further. The future is Python 3,not 2.3. And it's time for us to support Python 3. -- Schönen Gruß Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP Goebel Consult http://www.goebel-consult.de Monatliche Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/2012-12-in-die-cloud-in-die-cloud-ab-wo-soll-die-sein Blog: http://www.goebel-consult.de/blog/20050315 Goebel Consult ist Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
