You could say that and keep complaining about it, in the end not making 
anything more secure.
Or alternatively accept the fact and solve the security weakness 
differently.

On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:22:17 AM UTC-7, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>
>  Am 06.06.2014 06:57, schrieb Joachim Metz:
>  
>  He this is the default behavior on Windows for years, and you don't have 
> the same restriction there?
> What's up with that? Who's being "insecure"?
>  
>
> Yes, this is the behaviour on Windows. But it is insecure, as one can see 
> by all the Malware available for Windows. 
>
> We have to support his on Windows, because MS is not able or willed to 
> solve this problem. It is a burden of the past we have to live with. But 
> Unix has a multi-user for decades. If some Linux-Vendors think, it is a 
> good idea to downgrade this, I see no reason why we should support this 
> crap.
>
> -- 
>  Schönen Gruß 
> Hartmut Goebel 
>  Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP
> Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software 
> Development 
>
> Goebel Consult, Landshut 
> http://www.goebel-consult.de 
>
> Blog: 
> http://www.goebel-consult.de/blog/eine-millonen-aufkleber-fordern-asyl-fur-snowden
>  
> Kolumne: 
> http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/2012-09-steht-ein-manta-fahrer-vor-der-uni 
>
> Goebel Consult ist Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de/ 
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PyInstaller" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to