On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Lukasz Mach <[email protected]> wrote:
> (03.02.2012 21:33), Amit Deshwar wrote:
>> Can someone explain to me the moral objection to www?
it's not a moral principle - it's "leading by example". personally i
don't like having to type www, and pavlov-dog training the average
person to waste their time typing letters that are redundant strikes
me as being... well... if you want to use the word immoral go ahead,
but i'd say it was an "optimisation" to make people's lives that
little bit better - after they get over the complaining, the bitching
and the lack of comprehension, to type pyjs.org *not* www.pyjs.org.
to lead by example, you don't go "oh whoops i personally don't like
using www.{insert domain} but it's somehow okay to just forget about
that when there's something that you can directly do something about
it" you go "i personally don't like using www.{insert domain} and i'm
not going to let any domains over which i can directly do something
about it have www in front of them *especially* technically-orientated
domains".
pyjamas is bloody innovative. innovations are disruptive. get used
to innovation being disruptive!
come on folks. discuss something useful, for goodness sake.
l.
