On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Peter Bittner <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is not totally clean as the application only needs only one of > the bootstrap files! And the fact that the two bootstrap script file > at absolutely identical, apart from one having __pygwt_earlyUser() > empty and the other not for obvious reasons, makes me ask: Can't we > make this better and simply externalyse the __pygwt_earlyUser() > function? in theory yes... as long as you bear in mind that if it's 2 js files being loaded that's now 2 HTTP requests which results in a roundtrip delay. i'm tempted to say that if people really want to make their own bootstrap loader, copying it isn't such a big deal: if they've got good taste, sense and decency they'll submit it as a patch for use by everyone else. at the point where we have _three_ separate loaders or even 4, i'd then be inclined to think "hmmm..." l.
