Please!! Not sure what address is being used. But for [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> too Please!!!
Carl | (w) 978-513-2946 | F5 Networks www.f5.com<blocked::http://www.f5.com> [Description: cid:[email protected]] From: Tom Brander [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 10:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pyjamasdev] Unsubscribe Please!! Tom Brander 3763 West Jackson Blvd. Birmingham, AL. 35213 205-267-1089 http://oswco.com http://profiles.google.com/tombrander Google+ twitter: @dartdog On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Lex Berezhny <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Chris Brody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > The negotiated takeover of pyjs.org<http://pyjs.org> looks fine, please can > we give > credit to Luke [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for ownership of the > Pyjamas name? I think you've hit the nail on the head here. If Luke et al. want to continue running the project there is nothing stopping them from doing so under the Pyjamas name. The "fork" that Anthony has created will be called pyjs to match the domain name (which Luke didn't own anyways). Anthony did not take anything from Luke. Further more, the reason I think it's a bad idea to have this drawn out discussion is that pretty much the main reason for this fork is because of Luke leadership and project management decisions and actions. To have discussions of why the fork was done would invariably lead to quite a bit of personal attacks and petty arguments. Each one of us either accepts how the project has been run under Luke or we don't. Those that want Luke as their leader can carry on under Pyjamas name and those that want a fresh start and for something different can continue with Pyjs. Luke still has his server, nothing is stopping him from actually registering his own domain name this time and restarting the website and gitolite. And business as usual. - lex
<<inline: image001.png>>
