On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Rich Newpol <[email protected]> wrote: > Ooo my two cents - I like the override system, especially with the new > file-based (rather than directory-based) naming convention. My only issue > with the current override scheme is that it isn't always clear what you can > put in the override file and what you can leave out but there are lots of > examples to check. > > Aside from that bit of head-scratching, it's nice that overrides are clearly > seen at the directory level, and 'special' code doesn't clutter the > 'mainstream' code. > > Basically, I like it.
yes i like it much more now that they are all at the same level ... i guess i don't like the fact that many overrides are very minimal and don't really necessitate a whole new file. i think this makes it harder to actually remove dead code and/or reconcile the differences, because they are not next to each other. there is room to work here ... not really critical. maybe a mix of both, idk, but i do want to increase the visibility somehow. -- C Anthony
