... ? the website examples are all force built with --enable-strict > and a couple other flags for a number of reasons; i see this behavior > on Chrome still. > > all modules are force built to the same location, meaning: > > ../kitchensink/Logger.py > ../mail/Logger.py > > ... are in conflict. KitchecnSink is built first, thus the Mail > version is never built ... and therefore is importing the wrong > module. this is related to: > > Shouldn't we allow modules to have the same name in the examples? If not, how to propose that we fix it? Should we give unique names to each module in the examples, or should we do something in the background with pyjs so it gives modules unique names when converting to javascript?
Billy --
