On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Lex Berezhny <l...@damoti.com> wrote: > Any objections, thoughts or alternate volunteers?
My only objection to this large volume of code-moving is that PyJS's test suite is quite fragile, and does not appear to be running in CI anywhere. I think a better first step toward this would be to set up Travis or something, and get the tests running under something more modern and well-supported than PyV8 - for example, has anyone tried it under phantomjs? But however the tests are run, having some kind of automated idea of if the Grand Schism is going to be the Grand Oh Crap Nothing Works Any More in advance would be nice :-). Assuming that automated testing can be put in place to make sure that it doesn't break everything horribly, I don't really mind. Although I have to say that splitting everything up like this wouldn't actually solve any problem I've personally had with PyJS (I am a very light user though so my opinion in this regard should not count for much). -glyph -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
