On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Steve Waterbury <water...@pangalactic.us> wrote:
> ... in particular, why it doesn't make sense to 'pip install' pyjs. Personally I'd love to be able to 'pip install' it simply so that I can do 'pip install pyjs' and then get pyjampiler and pyjsbuild on my $PATH automatically, since pip provides nice tools and automation for that. Plus that would make it easier for build systems that already support setuptools (debian, fedora, et. al.) to build ready-made PyJS packages. This would also make it a lot easier for PyJS to depend on other Python projects for its own use, so that they could be automatically installed. If PyJS is to be split up into multiple pieces, it should be able to use *itself* as a Python library :-). I'd have no expectation that after 'pip install' it would be usable as a regular platform Python library though. -glyph -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
