On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 22:21 -0700, Sarvi Shanmugham wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:42:19 PM UTC-7, Kees Bos wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 20:29 -0700, Sarvi Shanmugham wrote:
> > I tried to hack a bit to simplify the generated code to see
> how it can
> > be done and this is what I got.
> > I left the $ alone for the reasons Lex mentioned. Turned
> the
> > dictionary accesses into object notation and
>
> That looks cleaner, but inhibits the use of closure compiler,
> since that
> will mangle object attributes (at high optimization).
> would you refering me to something that explains this? I am relative
> noob with this stuff.
>
It's somewhere in the docs or command line help. This is the issue (from
memory) after running closure compiler:
foo.something gets compressed to foo.XX
foo['something'] becomes foo.something
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pyjs.org Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
