Hi Amirouche, Can you provide some more details on what you see being merged?
If you are asking whether you can become a contributor on pyjs then I would say of course! I reviewed some of the Pythonium Core code and I'm not sure if any of that would be worth merging with pyjs. It seems like very preliminary experimental implementation. The difference between pyjs and literally every other Python to JavaScript implementation out there is that pyjs actually supports 95% of Python semantics... including multiple inheritance, etc. If you are looking to just translate Python to JavaScript source there are a lot of solutions that do this already (you've mentioned many of them yourself). Personally, unless the eventual goal is 100% Python support I don't see any point in these semantic-free translators. I think CoffeeScript fills that void very well especially since most IDE now-a-days provide excellent support for it (which you wouldn't have with a JavaScript semantic+Python syntax hybrid language). If you just want an alternative to writing JS syntax I would highly recommend CoffeeScript. And if you want to re-use code between CPython and a web browser than you can't really avoid implementing as much of Python semantics as possible. Pyjs gets enough of the semantics implemented to be productive but once you start trying to build frameworks or more complex code the remaining 5% of missing semantics really gets in the way. That's where we need the most help and effort. - lex -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
