In order to get people to consider it for new projects pyjs needs to support Python 3.
At this time even Python 2 is not fully supported. To get pyjs to fully support Python 3 would be a big effort. On Jun 10, 2016 10:38 AM, "Mark Lockett" <m...@deliveryengine.net> wrote: > I've been using PYJS quite a bit for projects over the last two years. I > find it's great until you hit a problem of something that is available in > normal Python but not in PYJS. I have had this happen with defaultdict and > SHA256. > > I'm not so sure that PYJS needs full time work, even small contributions > would be useful. > > Mark > > On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 3:53:08 AM UTC+8, Adrien wrote: >> >> On 09/06/2016 21:43, Lex Berezhny wrote: >> > As a purely volunteer project the scope of pyjs is too great. Someone >> > would have to get hired by a company that will pay them to work on pyjs >> > at least part time for serious progress to be made. >> > >> > Hoping won't accomplish anything. >> >> I do agree with you and I hope (*) that you didn't feel offended. I was >> expressing what I believe is a realistic point of view, but not to say >> "this should be done" - it is self understood that whatever people do as >> volunteers is more than what we have to expect from them :) >> >> >> (*) again... I may hope too much! >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pyjs.org Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
