On 27-Apr-01 Phil Thompson wrote: < snip 1-5 on why PyKDE1 is OK for me > > There is also 6... > Kick start PyKDE2 by implementing only enough of it for what you need for > your application. I and/or others could then run with it. I basically agree with you, ignoring some objections about the quality to date of KDE2 and the need to support legacy code (I appreciate that this has been largely a single-handed effort). The only remaining objection is that I'm pretty clueless as to where to begin (but no one with a clue seems to be willing to go ahead with PyKDE2). A few pointers on how/where to start would be helpful. Jim Bublitz _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
