On 06-May-02 Richard Jones wrote: > Any reason, BTW, why the next release isn't called PyKDE3, to > more closely relfect its relationship with KDE3?
I have been calling it other things lately, but nothing very marketable :) I chose PyKDE2 to try to minimize confusion with the original PyKDE (for KDE1) which is no longer supported. PyKDE2 *is* still supported for all 'official' KDE releases from KDE 2.1.1 forward and will continue to be for the forseeable future (beta, RC and alpha versions aren't supported though, including the recent 3.0beta2, which won't be supported in the next release). I should probably drop the '2' and just go back to PyKDE, as either PyKDE2 or PyKDE3 would be misleading. Having given it considerable thought (at least 30 seconds since I finished the previous sentence), I think the next release will be: PyKDE-3.2.1rc1 because: - it supports KDE versions from 2.1.1 through 3.0 - it requires sip/PyQt 3.2.1 (3.2 will probably work too) - there will only be a single tarball which will build for any supported KDE version. This seems to be working fairly well at the moment on my systems, but the 'rc1' is hedging against the possibility that there will be build problems for people not using SuSE Linux 7.1, 7.3 or 8.0. (I hope not) I'm dropping the beta, but there's still a lot that needs testing. Or maybe I'll try PyKDE3000. PyKDE-XP? Jim _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
